Poor Poor “Poopi” the Poodle

pet malpracticePoopi the poodle and her owners sued their veterinarian after Poopi underwent anesthesia for teeth cleaning and woke up with a three-inch scar on her abdomen. The vet mistakenly tried to spay Poopi, even though she had already been spayed as a puppy.

Poopi’s owners sought emotional distress damages for themselves as well as for Poopi, including expenses for Poopi’s psychological care. Plaintiffs conceded that under Ohio law dogs are considered to be personal property, but argued that the court should “do the right thing” by distinguishing pets from inanimate objects. They quoted from a law review article that equated the death of a “companion animal” to “the wrongful killing of any other family member.”

The Ohio Court of Appeals affirmed the trial judge, which had rejected the claim, although one member of the appellate panel concurred “reluctantly” and suggested that the legislature consider allowing damages for tortious injuries to pets.

Now that the suit has been wrapped up, perhaps Poopi should consult independent counsel about the possibility of pursuing emotional distress of having to go through life named “Poopi.”

— Oberschlake v. Veterinary Assoc. Animal Hosp., 785 N.E.2d 811 (Ohio Ct. App. 2003).

About Strange Judicial Opinions

Strange Judicial Opinions is dedicated to those robed raconteurs, rascals and renegades who brighten up the lives of lawyers and law students everywhere by daring to be different.

A legitimate debate exists as to whether it is appropriate for judges to use their written opinions and orders as vehicles for personal creative expression, including humor. Needless to say, at Lawhaha.com, we favor such efforts when they are clever, intelligent, cute, or just plain weird, and don’t unnecessarily demean lawyers or parties.

Even the soberest of judges can’t help writing amusing opinions and orders in cases involving odd facts, issues or parties. When, for example, a judge has an ex parte communication with a talking cat, is required to address lawsuits against God or Satan or respond to a plaintiff claiming to be a Martian, it’s not easy to retain the solemn tone that is the norm for legal proceedings.

Strange Judicial Opinions collects a variety of amusing or otherwise unusual judicial writings in the categories below. Enjoy!